- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:59:20 +0200
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: castonet@yahoo.co.uk, www-style@w3.org
2009/4/7 Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>: > Hi, > > On 01/04/2009, at 9:31 PM, Sergey Ilinsky wrote: > >> I have concerns about DOM Event interfaces defined in the "CSS Transitions >> Module Level 3" that is to become part of the CSS family standards. Knowing >> in rough details the architecture of the web technologies I think a CSS >> specification should not host any DOM events, since, for example, this >> dependency cannot be satisfied in case when a User Agent doesn't support DOM >> events (that I believe is not necessary). This also tightens the separated >> concerns of DOM, XML and CSS in a unprecedented way. >> >> Or, maybe I am mislead, and the specification in question and it is >> actually not considered as part of CSS family? > > You raise a good point. This is something we hesitated to add for the same > reasons you describe - that the page should work without support for the > events. > > However, the problem is that they are extremely useful, and make developing > some forms of effects much easier. > > It would be nice if they could be separated from the CSS part of the > specification. > They could be integrated into the CSS Object Model Module Level 3 (where CSS Matrix will be included, I hope) or CSS Events Module Level 3 could be prepared. > Dean > Giovanni
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 13:00:00 UTC