- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:42:37 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ian Hickson wrote: > > The technical disagreement (section 2.10) is based on a misunderstanding > of the spec. The section refers to "all floated dependants or only for > non-positioned floated dependants" but in CSS a float cannot be > positioned, making the distinction moot. My bad; as David Baron just pointed out to me, relatively positioned floats are possible, so in fact the list in section 9.9.1 will need fixing as well (items 3, 4, and 5 all need "non-positioned"). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 07:43:12 UTC