- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:58:20 +0200
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:
> > This is incorrect. Silverlight 2 is completely capable of using
> > bare font files, either packaged in the application ZIP file or
> > at standalone URLs in the same domain, via the WebClient
> > interface. Silverlight 2 does not support EOT.
> Silverlight 2 is in fact different, and I think I can explain how
> different. I am not sure however why this argument would have any
> value (beyond being embarrassing for Microsoft, which has already
> been established).
So, are you saying Silverlight 2 will not accept bare font files?
I think Silverlight's behavior is relevant to this discussion if fonts
cross the wire.
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2008 15:59:10 UTC