- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:40:24 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Also sprach Tab Atkins Jr.: > > border-parts: 1em auto 2em > Man, I was all ready to suggest using negative numbers on border length to > make it start from the middle rather than the corner, but this blows that > out of the water. Yes, border-parts is a substantially better proposal than > border-length. Super, thanks! > I'd suggest putting an example into the spec of something you can *only* do > with border-part - right now you're just duplicating what border-length can > do. Just use the examples you've already come up with in your email, as > they demonstrate the substantial power inherent in this. Right, here it is: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#border1 (These urls are unstable, the draft changes quickly these days) > Taking this idea slightly further, might this be a place to introduce flex > units? The auto keyword in this context is equivalent to 1fl, after all, > and this would address the requests that a few other authors have. I'd like > to see a comprehensive Flex module at some point, though... So, you could say: border-parts: 1em 1fl 1em 2fl 1em; and the first gap in the border would be half the size of the second one? It makes sense to me and I believe Philip Taylor will like it, too :) However, introducing a new unit is a pretty big deal. Where else would you use it? -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 15:41:16 UTC