- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 00:50:55 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
The proposed change to Appendix E has been approved[1], but the equivalent sentences in Section 9.5 (Floats)[2] and Section 9.9 (Layered presentation)[3] will also need revising. [1] http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css2.1#issue-17 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#floats [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#layers Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net > This change should affect more than floats. It should also affect > inline-block, inline-table, and positioned content with z-index: auto. > > See appendix E for details. > > --Markus > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-style-request@w3.org [mailto:www-style-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Ian Hickson > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:26 PM > To: www-style@w3.org > Subject: CSS21 z-index / stacking section error with rel-pos in floats > > > > It was observed that browsers don't quite implement E.2:5 as per the spec. > There's actually an error in the spec. Point 5 in E.2 should be changed as > follows: > > s/but any descendants which actually create a new stacking context/but any > positioned descendants and descendants which actually create a new > stacking context/ > > Testcase (assumes proposed changes): > http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/css/box/float/054.html > > Cheers, > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:17:14 UTC