- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:43:35 -0500
- To: Ingo Chao <i4chao@googlemail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Sadly, websites seem to somewhat depend on that behavior. That was a > major reason for the change from Firefox 3 beta 5 to Firefox 3 RC1 that > you see in your screenshot. And more precisely, they depend on the overflow:hidden box not wrapping past the float, even if the parent box has a fixed width that is insufficient to put the float and the preferred width of the overflow:hidden box on the same line. That means either not wrapping the overflow:hidden box even when it doesn't fit (the Firefox 2 behavior) or making it fit (the Firefox 3 RC1 behavior). If your concern is that in this case the containing shrink-wrap box should be wider, that seems valid; note that the width computation for this shrink-wrap box is not defined in the spec either. -Boris
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 22:44:22 UTC