- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 09:47:56 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>, Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Alan Gresley wrote: > > Now I know that my CSS wouldn't work since the spread would be '0' > > > I getting confused since I can find this from the 3rd Dec 2007. > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/Overview.html?rev=1.9 > > > Which has only 'background-shadow' and 'border-shadow' and the latest > from the 4th Apr 2008. > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/csswg/css3-background/Overview.html?rev=1.20 > > > Which only has box-shadow?????? > > > So part of my argument is based on shifting ground. :-/ It's an editor's draft. It's effectively a mirror of the editors' local disk copy. It hasn't been reviewed by the WG as a whole. It changes a lot in response to ideas and feedback. In this case it changed in response to some feedback, and changed back in response to other feedback. We made it public so you can see spec changes as soon as they happen. If you want something more stable, you can check out the latest /official/ Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/ If you want the latest-latest, dev.w3.org is the "bleeding edge". ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 16:48:55 UTC