W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [your feeback needed] :nth-child() argument

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:23 +0000
Message-ID: <47D7CBB3.40507@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
CC: "Molly E. Holzschlag" <molly@molly.com>, malarkey@malarkey.co.uk, Kevin Lawver <kplawver@aol.com>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@tantek.com>

Daniel Glazman wrote:

> We then propose to restrict whitespaces in the nth-child()'s
> argument to ONLY after the '(' and before the ')'. 

Very much opposed.  There is already a problem
in writing CSS, in that "URL (...)" is not
allowed, yet is a very common style of
punctuation (far more common, in my
experience, than "URL( ... )"; I would
far sooner that the existing restrictions
on the use of white space were relaxed
than even more stringent restrictions

Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 12:26:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:34 UTC