- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:39:14 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
* L. David Baron wrote: >I don't see why you think that. As I described in >http://www.w3.org/mid/20080306062701.GA25387@ridley.dbaron.org there >only seems to be one implementation that treats \a as causing >line-breaks with default values for 'white-space', and that's Opera. >The uncertainty is coming from the examples in the spec that >disagree with its normative text. If we remove those, it'll be >largely gone. And given that a majority of shipping implementations >of generated content agree with the normative text in the spec, I >think we should have a pretty strong bias towards keeping the >normative spec as-is. What I meant is that, when we added the white-space declarations to the example in the 'content' section and the sample style sheet, we just had content:"...\A..."; in both places, without accompanying white-space de- claration. That gave the incorrect impression you do not need to specify white-space, so we specified white-space explicitly in those places. I do not think we should have any content:"\A"; without white-space in the sample place, we should not remove the content:"\A" example in the 'content' section, and I assume you did not mean to suggest to remove the whole sample style sheet, so that would only leave the example in the 'white-space' section to be removed. I was concerned you wanted to remove more than that; I am perfectly fine with keeping the normative text as it is. Perhaps you can list the specific changes you had in mind? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 08:39:32 UTC