- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:36:29 -0800
- To: Www-style <www-style@w3.org>
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:35 PM Subject: Re: [cssom-view] small update To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I made a few small changes in how the APIs are defined (clearer > definitions, I think) and added AbstractView from DOM Level 2 Views. I > also renamed WindowView to ScreenView and defined it to be for visual > media only. I also moved offset*, scroll*, and client* attributes to their > own interface that will only function for objects implementing > HTMLElement. As roc mentioned on this list they're not that useful now we > have getClientRects() and getBoundingClientRect() so we might as well > restrict them for now. > > I also fixed small mistakes as reported on a blog entry by Peter-Paul Koch: > > http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2008/02/the_cssom_view.html > > The updated editor's draft can be found here: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/ > > I think it's ready for Last Call. Not without more tests its not. The way you've spec'd offset* doesn't really reflect what browsers do. You seem to be in denial about this, or are unwilling to investigate the matter more. You also seem to want to avoid a lot of questions and don't want to test. I'm not sure what the reluctance is. What is the problem, Anne? > > Kind regards, > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > >
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 20:36:43 UTC