Re: issue with url() in CSS 2.1 grammar

Steven Pemberton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:25:36 +0200, Daniel Glazman 
> <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
>> The problem is that a URL is not supposed to be zero-length...
> 
> There is nothing wrong with a zero-length URL.

Ah right, section 4.2 of RFC 3986 accepts empty relative-ref...
Sigh. Painful for css editors doing more than just syntax highlight
but real dynamic grammar checking.
Thanks :-(

</Daniel>

Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 13:07:48 UTC