Re: issue with url() in CSS 2.1 grammar

Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>> The empty string is a valid resource identifier [...]

> The problem is that a URL is not supposed to be zero-length...

These two statements are at odds with each other,
and at most one can be correct.  Given the concept
of a base URL, I /suspect/ that the former is more
accurate, but I cannot substantiate this as I write.


Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 12:40:46 UTC