- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:34:31 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Daniel Glazman: > > Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > > Also sprach Maciej Stachowiak: > > > > > >>> style sheet 1: @variable { X: 10px } > > > >>> style sheet 2: @variable { X: none } > > > >>> style sheet 3: div { width: var(X) } > > > > > Your above situation is analogous to the following: > > > > > > style sheet 1: div.someclass { width: 30px; } > > > style sheet 2: div#someid { width: 10px; } > > > style sheet 3: div { width: 20px; } > > > > It's different because because the validity of the declarations is > > known at parse-time. Invalid declarations should be dropped, and not > > be visible in the DOM. > > Both are perfectly valid Håkon... Not according to the proposal, section 3.3: The declaration becomes invalid if the variable does not exist. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 22:35:23 UTC