- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:24:06 -0500
- To: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 18:24:43 UTC
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > > On Friday 25 July 2008 17:33, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > > If it wouldn't break too much on the current web (ignoring the > > possibility that the average current website would be displayed on a > > projector or something, because it really wouldn't in normal use), > > I'd prefer a px to just be identical to whatever unit browsers use > > when an author specifies the width/height of an <img> (I suppose this > > is a device pixel?). > > Actually, if the browser uses CSS, then the pixels of a raster image > have the size of a 'px', not a device pixel. (That's not clear in the > current specification, but the WG decided to put it in the errata[1]. > At some point we will publish a new CR with the errata folded in, or > maybe we'll publish a Rec first and put the errata in the second > revision, CSS 2.2...) > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/CR-CSS21-20070719-errata.html#s.3.1 > Well, dang then. There goes any possibility of me offering a constructive suggestion. ^_^ Carry on, I suppose? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 18:24:43 UTC