- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 11:06:06 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > Personally, my preference is that it should be the author's responsibility > to pick a variable name that is not likely to conflict. Makes more sense to me for us to pick a syntax that will never conflict. Using bare keywords is both more difficult to implement and more likely to cause problems for authors. > I disagree that the functional notation is very CSS-y. It seems more > JavaScripty to me. So far I haven't had to use it very much at all in my > CSS (I know it is in clip and a couple of CSS3 properties). Plus it > requires five extra characters each and every time it is used, two of > which require the shift key. I would much rather just have one extra > character to type. How about the equals sign? It can be typed quicker, > plus it has a certain logic to it since it is often used for assignment > in other languages: > > background: =backgroundColor; That works for me. I was actually considering that the last time constants came up. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 18:06:45 UTC