- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:20:48 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 05:21:37 UTC
On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:07 PM, fantasai wrote:
> Another idea:
>
> /* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0183.html */
>
> @define for screen {
> foregroundColor: blue;
> backgroundColor: green;
> }
>
> @define boxStyle {
> border: 3pt solid;
> padding: 6pt;
> }
>
> @define buttonStyle for screen {
> border: outset silver;
> background: silver;
> }
I like this, except for "for screen". Putting it all in an @media
screen block should be enough, if you want to limit it to one media
type.
What I like: It is very simple and easy to remember and use. @define
is used for different types of variables (singletons or groups), and
it is the structure that determines how it is used. I like this much
more than the proposals with multiple names for the various flavors
(@values, @property-set).
It would also work well if we were to allow re-assigning values to
existing color keywords (for greater cross-UA consistency, perhaps):
@define {
orange: #f60;
green: #093;
}
This also very similar in structure to what I proposed for
@constant[1]. I also had a version for defining selector macros, that
would look like this if "@define" was the term of choice:
@define navlink( #sidenav ul li a, #topnav ul li a )
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0102.html
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 05:21:37 UTC