- From: Alan Gresley <alan1@azzurum.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:03:38 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- cc: www-style@w3.org, Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
fantasai wrote: > Ok, we can consider this for CSS4 Backgrounds and Borders if someone turns up with > a good use case. And if we do something like this, it'll most likely be using > rect() or inset() syntax like Brad mentioned, but on the background-clip and > background-origin properties. > > ~fantasai Thank you. I prefer rect() too. As I understand it, this: background-position: rect(0 0 0 0); will be: background-origin: rect(0 0 0 0); Giving the 'background-origin' property an extra value. This does make sense. My proposal was factored on the premise that 'background-origin' with just the values of 'border', 'padding' and 'content' was just to limiting. Adding the value 'rect()' for 'background-origin' makes this very powerful tool. This now leaves 'background-position' with the maximine of two values with the ability to position a background image from any of the four corners of an element. Is this possible for inclusion in CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders? Alan http://css-class.com/
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 17:04:05 UTC