- From: Ben Cotterell <ben.cotterell@antplc.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:42:08 +0000
- To: CSS <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 02:24:47PM -0600, David Hyatt wrote: > On Jan 27, 2008, at 10:00 AM, Ben Cotterell wrote: > > >> > > > >10.3.8 as it stands is quite good for replaced elements that really > >have > >intrinsic dimensions, like images. But less good for ones that don't, > >like iframes. > > > > > > We've had bugs filed against WebKit in the image case too. I don't > really agree that having intrinsic dimensions is the issue. I think > images should be stretchable as well. If the author specifies left:0 > and right:0, it doesn't matter whether the object has intrinsic > dimensions or not. The author's intent is clear. Ignoring what the > author explicitly requested just because the image had an intrinsic > size does not make much sense to me. I can't really argue with that. After all authors can override intrinsic dimensions by setting explicit widths and heights so why not by setting both left and right. -- Ben Cotterell Senior Software Engineer, ANT Software Limited
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 10:42:24 UTC