- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:49:13 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
David, >>>> should download css before parsing html. DD> But CSS is supposed to be an optional presentational layer. The DD> operative word should be "may" not "should". You have convinced me, CAS (third layer: with attributes, but without properties) would more suitable, than CSAS. P.S. 'optional' theoretically or practically ? I know people, who browse without downloading pictures (e.g. I), but i know nobody, who without css. As was mentioned, one css-file per hundreds other files of site is less one persent of traffic, so this is not actual for robots. --- >> DD> Lynx is a browser. Lynx does not support JavaScript. >> It cover very little part of population. >> To my mind, it's anachronism. DD> To my mind it is a small, fast, useful tool. Size of program is not important in epoch of DVD, BluRay, etc. It's not important, how much time of rendering is less constants of human perception (1 sec): 0.05 sec or 0.5 sec (comparing browsers in identical conditions, i.e. for textual framework). And without pictures, it's not useful - observe today's inet. >>>>>> Nothing disturb author to write in previous manner. >>>> DD> Initial authors perhaps, but not maintainers who have to find >>>> DD> out where the previous author decided to put the information. >> DD> URIs that are being linked to, >> These are places with unique information - >> they will remain in htm-file. DD> Your proposal would allow them to appear in the stylesheet. Yes, any technology allows author to harm himself. Dmitry Turin SQL5 (5.10.0) http://sql50.euro.ru HTML6 (6. 5.2) http://html60.euro.ru Unicode7 (7. 2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2. 0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 14:47:54 UTC