- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:22:03 +0000
- To: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
On 20 Jan 2008, at 21:28, Dmitry Turin wrote: > DD> Lynx is a browser. Lynx does not support JavaScript. > It cover very little part of population. > To my mind, it's anachronism. To my mind it is a small, fast, useful tool. >>> should download css before parsing html. > DD> Why? > > To get benefit of proposal. But CSS is supposed to be an optional presentational layer. The operative word should be "may" not "should". > DD> You still haven't provided any examples. > > I have no statistics. I asked for examples, not statistics. >>>>> Nothing disturb author to write in previous manner. >>> DD> Initial authors perhaps, but not maintainers who have to find >>> out >>> DD> where the previous author decided to put the information. > DD> URIs that are being linked to, > > These are places with unique information - > they will remain in htm-file. Your proposal would allow them to appear in the stylesheet. > DD> This would include expansions of acronyms, > DD> language the document is written in > > If acronym are in several places of document, > it's reasonable to put its expansion into css. > If language are the same for several documents, > it's reasonable to put it into css. No, it isn't, because those pieces of data are about meaning not style. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 07:31:34 UTC