- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:31:33 +0100
- To: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Cc: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Christoph Päper: > > font-variant-caps: normal | smallcaps > > acronym {font-variant-caps: smallcaps /* c2sc wanted */} > acronym {font-variant-caps: petitecaps /* c2pc wanted */} > .author {font-variant-caps: smallcaps /* smcp wanted */} > .author {font-variant-caps: petitecaps /* pcap wanted */} > > Petite caps are of course even rarer than small caps. I think this may be a general problem facing us as we venture into new font features: the number of fonts that support these new features are limited, and not many users have access to them. > > font-variant-digits: normal | oldstyle | lining > > font-variant-width: normal | proportional | monospace > > You said in a followup message this would primarily be used for > digits, but what if a font has a full-featured monospace variant? It's a judgement call, I think. My gut feeling is that there should be a switch (i.e., a propertye) which is limited in scope to digits. The use case is obvious. > "Old style" may be standard jargon, but I find it's a biased name > to avoid. Orphans and widows made it into CSS, so I think we can live with oldstyle :-) Cheers, -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Sunday, 20 January 2008 23:31:47 UTC