- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:17:02 -0500
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: www-style Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > The first sentence of section 10.3.8 [1] is: > > This situation is similar to the previous one, except that the element > has an intrinsic width. > > This sentence seems to be informative, not normative, and has confused > at least one person into thinking that this section does not apply to > replaced elements without an intrinsic width. See > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=412679#c12> (down past all > the quoted stuff). > > I suggest just removing this sentence, since it has nothing to add to > the normative part of the section. The width computation is covered > completely by step 1 in the list. Does replacing # This situation is similar to the previous one, except that the element # has an intrinsic width. The sequence of substitutions is now: with | This situation is similar to the previous one, except the sequence of | substitutions is now: solve the problem? ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 06:17:11 UTC