- From: Dmitry Turin <sql4-en@narod.ru>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:29:07 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
David, >> DD> Please, no. That would require every user agent to support style >> DD> sheets before they could process documents. >> 1) <style> ... </style> is not problem at all. >> 2) downloading of css-file may occur during downloading html-document >> with simultaneously correction of displaying - >> compare with correction of document during simultaneously >> downloading >> of document and its <img> DD> These points seem entirely unrelated to mine (which is that this DD> would stop CSS being an optional presentation layer and turn it in to DD> a mandatory semantic layer). Objection does not work against <style> at all. About css-file: <head> <link href="1.txt" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"> <link href="2.txt" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"> </head> "1.txt" is usual css-file (optional), "2.txt" is file with values of attributes (mandatory). Look at download htm-file and "2.txt" as to downloading of _one_ documents, devided into two files. Merging of "1.txt" and "2.txt", or separation into two css-files (i.e. optimization) is deal of author of document. I'm against to enter new values for @type or @rel _for this purpose_ , because brain will must keep this devision without any benefit. Dmitry Turin SQL5 (5.9.1) http://sql50.euro.ru HTML6 (6.5.1) http://html60.euro.ru Unicode7 (7.2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 09:28:00 UTC