- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:26:05 +0000
- To: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > > http://bradclicks.com/cssplay/centerfloat.html > This one actually demonstrates my point that the only examples I can vaguely remember seeing in print don't have rectangular embedded content. To make this one work well, I think you would need to cut out drop shapes around the individual drops. It also uses text spanning the insert, whereas my impression was the proposal was being interpreted as splitting into two columns, one each side. In this case, I think it probably does need to span. I'm not sure how it how well it would work with word justification on both sides, which would be needed to make the words easy to read; if you break between characters, you are producing art, not a document to be read. I have a suspicion that the justification would need tuning by hand or an algorithm optimized for this sort of imagery, which is an indication for using a PDL; I think getting words stretched on one side but not the other would look awkward. (You might also want to try to get the breaks to be on characters that sloped the same way as the relevant edge of the drop.) I think the headline is too long to get away with spanning the text, and maintain readability, but it isn't deep enough to justify going to two columns just for the headline. I can imagine cases where the drops would be allowed to obliterate the text (I assume that, here, we are expected to pretend that they don't), although that would be in the sort of publication that is there mainly for the advertising. There is nothing, of course, in this example, that couldn't be done in print. And, in particular, the best way of handling something like this is a page description language, because it is likely to need hand tuning to look really good. To do this with web media, I would think the best approach would be to slightly desaturate the image of the drops and use them as a background image. The image is certainly pure styling snd should only exist in the style sheet. That technique is also very common in glossy magazines. If you want the headline to cut into the text, I think the only way to make it easy to read is to use columns conventionally, although, as you point out, that can make reading difficult on a screen (Acrobat now offers the ability to reflow as one column to get round that case). Incidentally, I would have needed to disable images to read the bottom line (or select it). I suspect you are complying with the letter but not the spirit of attribution requirements, i.e. you've styling to effectively remove inconvenient content. Also, Arial is Microsoft only and the Drip... is more than 2.8em in the font that Linux Firefox substitutes. It seems to display the overflow. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 7 January 2008 08:26:34 UTC