- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:30:11 -0800
- To: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 3, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > Brad Kemper wrote: > > >> HTML & CSS allow you to /influence/ the > >> design, but if you want to /control/ it > >> you would do better to adopt a page- > >> description language such as PDF. > > > > Why is it that every time I suggest that Cascading STYLE Sheets > be used > > to style the page in a predictable way, some one feels a need to > express > > this "love it or leave it" attitude? If you don't think that CSS > should > > be able to set the visual style of the page, then maybe you would do > > better to stick to a language that does not describe the > rendering of > > the page with any precision, such as HTML without CSS. > > How can CSS "style the page in a predictable way" > when the effects of the cascade are unpredictable > to the page author ? > > Philip TAYLOR Huh?
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 15:30:28 UTC