- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:37:58 +0100
- To: "Christof Hoeke" <csad7@t-online.de>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:15:40 +0100, Christof Hoeke <csad7@t-online.de> wrote: > It is much clearer now, just one small point. I am not sure if it would > clarify it a bit more if one could add something like (I guess there is > a better wording though): > > ... that the namespace name part of the expanded name > has no value or is the empty string. > > Somehow if I read "no value" I think it has to be ``null`` or ``None`` > but not "". The empty string is just a syntactic detail in some serializations. We should not introduce that into namespace definitions. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 22:33:47 UTC