- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:56:21 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Le 7 févr. 2008 à 07:37, fantasai a écrit : > karl@w3.org wrote: >> Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "CSS Module: Namespaces" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/ >> 2006-08-28 2nd WD >> About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-namespace-20060828/#intro >> [[[ The terminology used in this specification is that of [XML- >> NAMES11]. ]]] >> * The link given for [XML-NAMES11] is [Namespaces in XML 1.1, 4 >> February 2004][1]. The document >> has been republished since and the last version is "Namespaces in >> XML 1.1 (Second Edition)" >> published on August 16, 2006. Update your document for correct links. >> * The reference for "Namespaces in XML 1.1" is given in the >> Informative references section. If >> the intent of the WG is to use the nomenclature of XML Namespaces >> 1.1 with a proper meaning. It >> is not anymore an informative reference, then the reference MUST be >> in the normative references >> section. >> * Then Later on in the document in Section 3 "Declaring Namespaces: >> …" there is a reference to XML >> Namespaces [REC-XML-NAMES] which is yet another version of XML >> Namespaces. Be consistent in your >> references to XML Namespaces. >> [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names11-20040204/ > > The references have all been changed to Namespaces in XML 1.0. > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-namespace/ > > Please let us know if this addresses your comment. Yes it does. Thanks. -- Karl Dubost - W3C http://www.w3.org/QA/ Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 06:56:31 UTC