- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:03:06 +0000
- To: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
- CC: daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com, www-style@w3.org
Agreed : I wasn't in any sense arguing
against the idea (the more clustering
possibilities, the better, IMHO); I was
just trying to explain it for Daniel's
benefit.
** Phil.
--------
Jens Meiert wrote:
>>> I am sorry but I don't understand at all your
>>>
>>> .old = .new
>> Isn't ".old = .new" just a convenient alternative
>> to ".old, .new {}" ?
>
> Exactly. The more occurrences and the longer the selectors, the more “convenient” though:
>
> .old = .new;
> .new {}
> .new, .somethingelse {}
> .new, .different {}
> .new, .whatever {}
>
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 17:03:40 UTC