- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:15:22 -0700
- To: daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com
- Cc: steven.pemberton@cwi.nl, dbaron@dbaron.org, derhoermi@gmx.net, www-style@w3.org, public-forms@w3.org, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Daniel, Yes, CSS having explicit versioning would be one way to fix this once and for all. But given that the CSS group insists that it will never need versioning --- analogous to hTML asserting it's the same across versions (another assertion I dont believe)-- the Last Call issue raised by the forms and xhtml groups is particularly telling. Given where we are in the email discussion, I'd recommend that the Forms and XHTML WGs change this to a "formal LC objection " Daniel Glazman writes: > > Steven Pemberton wrote: > > > * Because of CSS's versioning mechanism, it is a Bad Thing if rules > > change meaning across versions > > Steven, that's the point : CSS has no versions... only levels. > I have said many times in the past that we now need to get rid > of levels to move to versions. > > </Daniel> -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:16:35 UTC