- From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:30:31 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
David Baron wrote: > Including a URL here would help (in general, and even more so in this > case, since box-sizing has appeared in multiple drafts). This comment > may well be missed by the relevant editor since somebody searching for > comments on that spec would be unlikely to find this discussion). Oops missed that I had copied it to the clipboard but forgot to paste it. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-ui-20040511/#box-sizing > > Note. This is the behavior of width and height as commonly > implemented > > by legacy HTML user agents for replaced elements and input elements. > > I think this statement about replaced elements is wrong (at least that > generally). For images, width and height have always applied to the > content-box width. For form controls, they may well have been > border-box. I was wondering that as well but didn't want to make too many changes here since I really wanted to focus on HTML tables. I will open up an issue on tracker to also cover the image sizing and we can discuss that as well. -- Thanks, Arron Eicholz
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2008 22:31:12 UTC