- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:57:38 +0100
- To: <ishida@w3.org>, <www-style@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org > Sent: 19 September 2007 15:05 > To: www-style@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org > Subject: [CSS3 Ruby] i18n comment 5: Expected behaviour for > value right > > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-ruby-20030514/ > > Comment 5 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0505-css3-ruby/ > Editorial/substantive: E/S > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 4.1right [http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-ruby-20030514/#rubypos] > > Comment: > Please provide a more detailed explanation and examples of > expected behaviour for the value right. This is currently not > clear at all. > > > My understanding, from talking with Michel Suignard, is that > this was intended to support the bopomofo case, which > requires special placement of ruby text characters on the > right side of horizontal and vertical text. > > > (If this is the case, it may be better to call this value > 'bopomofo', since the rules for bopomofo tone placement are > very idiosyncratic.) > FYI I came across an email from 2001 where Martin Duerst says "'ruby-position: right' was created specifically for Bopomofo. (I think it was proposed by Dekai Wu in the Hong Kong meeting of the I18N WG, but I might be wrong.)" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-wg/2001Feb/0179.html RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 08:55:20 UTC