- From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <kde@carewolf.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:00:04 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Saturday 08 September 2007 03:12, Michael Day wrote:
> >> So img {content: url(blah);}
> >> is not valid strictly speaking.
> >
> > It's part of a CSS3 proposal (and is implemented in Opera).
>
> And Prince, which also supports:
>
> img { content: attr(src, url) }
>
And Konqueror, if I remember correctly the next version of Safari will also
have limited support for setting content url on IMG tags.
Though I have to admit I have been considering pulling the feature out of
KHTML again and replace it with a "img::replace" generated element syntax.
The reason is that we already have 3 bug-reports on this feature:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130689
So implement this comes at a cost :(
`Allan
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2007 07:00:11 UTC