- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:35:30 -0700
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> To: <www-style@w3.org> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [CSS3] foreground-image >On Friday 2007-09-07 12:35 -0700, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: >> The @content defines only one piece of information - source of >> image but it does not define how bits are being rendered: stretched, >> positioned, etc. That is the main problem. > >I'd rather have something like: > > content: image(url(foo.png), 25, 25, 300, 300); > >as proposed in comments 3 and 4 of: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113577 > >that would apply to all properties that deal with images >(background-image, list-style-image, etc.). This is out of scope of foreground-image per se but anyway... What will happen if image does not support pixel cropping in principle? SVG for example. And I think croping of jpegs and a-gifs is also not a good idea. I would rather think about packaging bunch of related images into something similar to tar, mime or zip files. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2007 05:36:28 UTC