- From: James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:21:58 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Cc: CSS <www-style@w3.org>
Alex, On Oct 1, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: > Thanks for the comments! > > Note: I've published an update at http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-grid/ > overview.html . It addresses some of these points. > I will try and look at the update in the next few days. Keep up the good work. > > At F2F we've settled at 'fr' (for 'fraction'), (http://dev.w3.org/ > csswg/css3-grid/overview.html#explicit ). What do you think? I think 'fr' is fine. Just so it matches the rest of the units, unlike '*' and does not confuse people with other backgrounds (like perl and shell programming) by using the '*' in a way that does not match their expectations. Oh! I just had a thought, although I doubt the rest of the group will appreciate it. If, sometime in the future, the CSS-style group decides to add pattern matching (regular expressions / searching) the '*' (star) will still be available. (I have several use cases for pattern matching in CSS, but the responses I got when I asked about adding it to the language were very negative.) > > Thanks again for comments > Alex You're welcome, James Elmore
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:22:23 UTC