- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:53:09 +0000
- To: Jason CranfordTeague <jason@brighteyemedia.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Jason CranfordTeague wrote: > As for making it "pretty" a low priority over making it "usable", in my > a opinion usable has to be "pretty". Can you explain that ? I would have thought that in order to be usable, a site has to be accessible; if it's pretty as well, that's a bonus (for sighted users) but in the greater scheme of things, I'd look for "accessible", "navigable", "consistent", "coherent", "intuitive" and any one of a half-dozen or so similar concepts before "pretty". Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2007 15:53:56 UTC