- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:24:25 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > background-position should be defined in such a way that it takes the > resulting size of the image into account and not be based on the > original size of the image. A line saying that references to the > dimensions of the image refer to the size after background-size has been > applied would suffice I think. For -o-background-size we currently > implement the non-intuitive version and are planning to change this. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-background-20050216 I'll make this change unless Bert objects. Bert, do you object? :) ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 16 November 2007 23:24:54 UTC