- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:46:18 +0200
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
On Nov 15, 2007, at 18:47, Henri Sivonen wrote: > * Various values don't have any validation provisions about negative > values. This is fine from the UA point of view for everything except > ratios of two negative numbers, because non-sensical values fail to > match anyway. However, it might make sense to treat negative values > as authoring conformance errors. > > * Similarly, it might make sense to consider grid values over 1 > conformance errors. On a second thought, support for calc() introduces sufficient complexity that it probably isn't worthwhile to try to determine if values--even simple ones--are in a sensible range. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2007 14:46:34 UTC