- From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:44:16 +1100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi David, > No, I'm saying that the implied counter would increment no matter > what the counter-increment property says, so an author who wants to > undo the increment would use -1. (But the better way would still be > to use a different counter.) That's not how we do it in Prince, we let the user override automatic increments by specifying an increment of zero for that counter. It seems logical, as it avoids introducing the concept of an unchangeable shadow increment that can't be directly modified, but only canceled out. Cheers, Michael -- Print XML with Prince! http://www.princexml.com
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 10:44:43 UTC