W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2007

Re: [CSS3-content] [css3-lists] [css3-page] Implied counter-increment

From: Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:44:16 +1100
Message-ID: <472EF400.2020001@yeslogic.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

Hi David,

> No, I'm saying that the implied counter would increment no matter
> what the counter-increment property says, so an author who wants to
> undo the increment would use -1.  (But the better way would still be
> to use a different counter.)

That's not how we do it in Prince, we let the user override automatic 
increments by specifying an increment of zero for that counter. It seems 
logical, as it avoids introducing the concept of an unchangeable shadow 
increment that can't be directly modified, but only canceled out.



Print XML with Prince!
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 10:44:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:31 UTC