- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:09:00 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20070307210900.GA14398@ridley.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2007-03-07 14:11 -0600, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > Extending this quirk from HTML to "XHTML" is a _lot_ more work than just > changing the wording of that one sentence in the spec. No, I don't think it is. The wording in the spec is already pretty detailed; it properly accounts for HTML documents that have multiple HTML elements or multiple BODY elements due to DOM manpulation: # For HTML documents whose root HTML element has computed values of # 'transparent' for 'background-color' and 'none' for # 'background-image', user agents must instead use the computed # value of those properties from that HTML element's first BODY # element child when painting backgrounds for the canvas, and must # not paint a background for that BODY element. Such backgrounds # must also be anchored at the same point as they would be if they # were painted only for the root element. And, for what it's worth, I support this change. For my rationale, see http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-March/009878.html -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 21:09:11 UTC