- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:05:34 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
Daniel Beardsmore wrote: >> Generally because it is either (a) Experimental or (b) Unfinished > But it would seem better, if such a feature is defined in CSS (which it is) It isn't. The Mozilla implementation doesn't entirely (as far as I know) match the draft specification, and the specification is not yet a recommendation and thus subject to change. > After all, if you don't implement it, you get pretty useless output! All > newlines and consecutive spaces are lost. CSS is supposed to be an optional presentation layer, the HTML should be capable of standing on its own. > So if there is something like a working implementation, let people see it. They do - by giving it a different name. That way people can try it out. When (and if) they finish implementing it / the spec becomes a recommendation, they can change the name. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 08:05:43 UTC