- From: Eli Friedman <sharparrow1@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 14:14:57 -0800 (PST)
- To: rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
That's about right; the specification isn't really clear about what to do, which is why I'm bringing it up here instead of just changing the bahavior. If the correct behavior was clear, there would be no need to discuss it. -Eli --- Rainer Åhlfors <rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net> wrote: > > I just want to make sure we are clear with regards > to any future discussion, > and differentiating between browser bugs (as in, > incorrect implementation of > spec in browser) and undesired browser behavior (as > in, spec is vague or > unclear, causing expected user behavior not to align > with spec, as is the > case with this scenario). > > > Rainer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU] > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:19 PM > To: rahlfors@wildcatsoftware.net > Cc: www-style@w3.org > Subject: Re: Expected overflow behavior for element > with clip set? > > Rainer Åhlfors wrote: > > the spec as written today supports the behavior of > the browsers. Hence, it > is > > not a browser bug. > > No one ever claimed it's a browser bug. The mail > you were responding to > was a comment on the spec, not on implementations. > > -Boris > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cheap talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates. http://voice.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 2 March 2007 22:15:12 UTC