- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:11:27 -0400
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- CC: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > > Simon Pieters wrote: >> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:48:03 +1100, Lachlan Hunt >> <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: >>> Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >>>> * "Selectors API" [...] does not define how to handle case diferences >>>> either, >>> >>> I think the best way to handle this would be... >>> >>> The case sensitivity of namespace prefixes in selectors depends on >>> the >>> mechanism used to declare them. For example, prefixes declared using >>> @namespace in CSS are case-insensitive, whereas prefixes declared >>> using xmlns are case-sensitive. >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#casesens >> >> In any case, it would be nice if the Selectors spec could address this >> issue in one way or the other. :-) > > As the editor of the Selectors API spec, I need this issue resolved in > Selectors as soon as possible so that I can finally resolve the related > issue in Selectors API. I'm aware that there is currently no active > editor for the spec (unless someone has since taken over from Hixie), > but could the CSS WG please at least discuss this issue and find a > resolution for it? > > I would prefer the solution I proposed above to be accepted because it > would make it easier to resolve the issue in Selectors API and it would > also allow a more sensible solution to be used in XBL. But either way, > an answer would allow me to proceed with an appropriate solution. The CSS Working Group has accepted your proposed wording for the Selectors specification with the change s/depends on/is defined by/. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 17:11:34 UTC