On Dec 19, 2007, at 1:12 PM, David Hyatt wrote: > Text-shadow is shadowing some actual drawing. Box-shadow, though, > is just a decorative effect around the edges of a box. I don't > think they are that similar (other than syntactically). > > Possible new properties that would shadow actual drawing and that > would behave more like text-shadow include: > shadow - Shadow all drawing done by the object and its descendants. > border-shadow - Shadow actual border drawing (would get messy at > border corners just as RGBA overlap does) > background-shadow - Shadow actual background drawing (this would do > more what you want with a partially transparent background for > example, since the shadow would show through the transparency) > Of these, "shadow" seems to be the least problematic property name. The other two imply that you could include the shadow's values in a plain "background" or "border" and expect it to work. I'm not sure that's possible, wouldn't the parser hiccup when seeing another color value, or a pair of unit values? Is there some way to delimit it that I'm not aware of, that could make it non-ambiguous? Or would you just not have them as part of plain border/background? > John Oyler john@discrevolt.comReceived on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:19:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:24 UTC