- From: Charles A. Landemaine <landemaine@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:25:29 -0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Dec 8, 2007 8:05 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I think we'll probably leave the gradient definitions with SVG: > you can use an SVG image to define the gradients Hi Fantasai, Yes, SVG is promissing, however it would be interesting not having to link to an external file and being able to use gradients (and other visual effects) only with a style steet. Think about these large portals that have more than a hundred image files (ie: CNN, Yahoo...). Each three-way TCP/IP connection to download an image file make the page rendering slower. If most graphics were created with CSS, and disn't need an external graphics file, it would load a lot faster, it would load less the server and it would use less space or files on the server as well. Think about all these graphics used for round corners, for shadows, for gradients...If people change them from .png to .svg, there will be little benefit, other than scalability (which is not even always needed). Cheers, -- Charles A. Landemaine.
Received on Saturday, 8 December 2007 19:25:36 UTC