- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:55:26 +0200
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Alex Mogilevsky:
 > Although I was resisting "float-offset" definition initially, I
 > have to admit it is brilliant. It handles all cases of facing pages
 > and writing directions in the most minimal way.
Thanks! Likewise, I think the 'gr' unit is brilliant.
 > One statement in the definition of float-offset I disagree with so
 > far (or perhaps I don't quite understand its meaning):
 > 
 > "If the 'gr' unit or percentage unit is used, it means that the
 > middle of the float should be aligned with the specified grid line
 > (or portion thereof)."
 > 
 > I think this mixes two different concepts (positioning and
 > centering), 
I'd argue that it's still about positioning (not centering), but it
also moves the reference point of the floated element.
 > and even in the use case table
 > (http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css3-src/css3-gcpm/uc.html) "gr"
 > usually just means position, only in case #30 it means centering.
So, how would you like to set the reference point?
In your example for use case #30, you use the percentage value to
express centering. Do you think this is better? I'm probably ok with
switching to percentages, in which case my example for use case #30
would read:
blockquote {
  float: top left column;
  float-offset: 50% 50% }
The "vertical 50%" value is quite easy to explain: the midpoint of the
float is positioned half-way down the column. Likewise, 0% and 100%
would intuitively make sense -- at least if one knows the definition
of "background-position".
The "horizontal 50%" is harder to get. Hmm.
-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 15:55:47 UTC