- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 12:54:08 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:05:02 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > I wrote up a draft for a module that would define the 'binding' and > ':bound-element' properties: > > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/css-module.html It should be clarified what happens when a URI can't be resolved, isn't available, isn't a supported binding language, etc. Either this draft should define what happens or it should require specifications using this draft to define the particular processing model. Also, what would happen if two binding languages are supported? It assumes implicit inheritance but the two binding languages might not be compatible with each other... Furthermore, I think the specification should explicitly note the circular reference between 'binding' and :bound-element just as it's done in the XBL specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ section 5.10. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 10:54:28 UTC