W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2006

RE: [css3-background] 'background' shorthand

From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 21:40:40 +0100
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <1146775242.15723.1.camel@cyberman.dorward.me.uk>

On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 11:15 +0300, S.F. Alim wrote:
> Well I believe that size is necessary but what about image should flip
> vertical or horizotal or even mirror it - I mean inverse it like whatever is
> right to left should be left to right

I haven't been following CSS 3 closely enough to know if such a thing
has been proposed. Is this a new proposal? A rehash of a rejected
proposal? Or a question about how something in a draft spec could be
implemented in shorthand? If the latter could you direct me to the
relevent section of the draft so I can see how it is implemented as a
standalone property pleas

David Dorward                           <http://dorward.me.uk/>
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad, in some way or another."
                             -- The Greatest Show in the Galaxy
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 20:43:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:24 UTC