- From: Laurens Holst <lholst@students.cs.uu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:08:04 +0200
- To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 09:08:17 UTC
David Woolley schreef: >> can=92t render, actually, it seems only logical, and it is what most UAs=20 >> do today. So I don=92t think there is a problem. > > Most browsers are IE. IE doesn't! We’re talking about new features, whose implementation is going to be years in the future. Plenty of time for IE, when they’re going to implement this, to fix their fallback behaviour at the same time. I don’t see why a current (fixable) bug in one browser should put limits on future behaviour... The other implementations clearly show that this can be implemented interoperably, and as far as the specification is concerned this should be enough, for now. So as I said, I don’t think there is a problem. ~Grauw -- Ushiko-san! Kimi wa doushite, Ushiko-san nan da!! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Laurens Holst, student, university of Utrecht, the Netherlands. Website: www.grauw.nl. Backbase employee; www.backbase.com.
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 09:08:17 UTC