- From: Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:59:30 +0000
- To: www-style@w3.org
"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> wrote: >>> I believe the definition given in >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#intrinsic is incorrect as it >>> states that CSS 2.1 assumes that all replaced elements have intrinsic >>> dimensions, while CSS 2.1 doesn't make such an assumption at all. >> >> It does right there, imo no other reference or explanation is required >> since it is a normative statement. > >I'm not sure what you mean. Note that section 10.3.2[1], 10.6.2 and >related sections clearly state how to come to a 'width' and 'height' for a >replaced element when no intrinsic dimensions are available... Right you are, I need to clear 2.0 out of my memory. -- Spartanicus (email whitelist in use, non list-server mail will not be seen)
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 17:04:14 UTC