- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:04:54 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:52:15 +0100, Spartanicus <spartanicus.3@ntlworld.ie> wrote: >> I believe the definition given in >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#intrinsic is incorrect as it >> states that CSS 2.1 assumes that all replaced elements have intrinsic >> dimensions, while CSS 2.1 doesn't make such an assumption at all. > > It does right there, imo no other reference or explanation is required > since it is a normative statement. I'm not sure what you mean. Note that section 10.3.2[1], 10.6.2 and related sections clearly state how to come to a 'width' and 'height' for a replaced element when no intrinsic dimensions are available... [1]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visudet.html#inline-replaced-width> [2]<http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visudet.html#inline-replaced-height> -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 24 March 2006 16:05:08 UTC